"What, for instance, could our notion of the “supernatural” mean for peoples who have no such sense of a “natural” realm composed of mindless, nonhuman realia subject only to their own laws?”

(Sahlins, Forword in Descola 2013, Beyond Nature and Culture, xiii)

Welcome to the Reading Group on Descola's Ontolgies

Philippe Descola Descola, held the Chair in the Anthropology of Nature at the Collège de France (2000-2019), has built on his ethnographic research with the Achuar of the Upper Amazon to contribute to the comparative study of human-nonhuman relations. His most widely known contribution has been the development of a framework that displaces the assumed universality of the Western nature/culture dichotomy by providing models of four possible ontological modes of structural relations through which humans and nonhumans form viable collectives. This research takes the form of a book Beyond Nature and Culture (2013 [2005]) showing how the differences between the four ontological modes are made evident in the investigation of processes of iconic figuration.


Our reading group aims at reading the first five chapters of Beyond Nature and Culture constituting the theoretical basis of Descola's four ontologies (animism, totemism, analogism, and naturalism)


Schedule and readings

Meetings will take place Fridays from 10:00-12:00, Seminarraum, Institute für Wissensgeschichte des Altertums (Arnimallee 10)

Date


Reading

Chapter 1: Configurations of Continuity & Chapter 2: The Wild and the Domesticated

Chapter 3: The Great Divide & Chapter 4: The Schemas of Practice

Brake

Chapter 5: Relations with the Self and Relations with Others

Chapter 6: Animism Restored

Chapter 7: Totemism as an Ontology

TBC






Additional References


  • Descola, P. (2014). Anthropology of Nature : Inaugural lecture delivered on Thursday 29 March 2001. In Anthropology of Nature : Inaugural lecture delivered on Thursday 2 March 2001. Paris : Collège de France. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cdf.3631 )

  • Descola, P. (2014). Modes of being and forms of predication. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1), 271-280. (Doi: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.012.)

  • Descola, P. (2014). The grid and the tree: Reply to Marshall Sahlins’ comment. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1), 295-300. (Doi: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.015.)

  • Descola. (2016). Biolatry: A Surrender of Understanding (Response to Ingold’s “A Naturalist Abroad in the Museum of Ontology”). Anthropological Forum, 26(3), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2016.1212523

  • Kelly, J. D. (2014). Introduction: The ontological turn in French philosophical anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1), 259-269. (Doi: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.011.)

  • Ingold. (2016). A Naturalist Abroad in the Museum of Ontology: Philippe Descola’s Beyond Nature and Culture. Anthropological Forum, 26(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2015.1136591

  • Sahlins, M. (2014). On the ontological scheme of Beyond nature and culture. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1), 281-290. (Doi: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.013.)




Contact

Néhémie Strupler

Freie Universität Berlin
Fachbereichs Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften
Institut für Wissensgeschichte des Altertums
Arnimallee 10
14195 Berlin (Germany)
nehemie.strupler@fu-berlin.de 

0 Kommentare

Sie sind nicht angemeldet. Ihre Änderungen werden mit anonym markiert. Sie sollten sich anmelden, wenn Sie bereits über ein Konto verfügen.