Versionen im Vergleich

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.

...

Panel

The wiki-project presents different understandings of the concept of "rule of law" and their specific normative implications in various legal systems of the world. Brief country reports shall illustrate the different understandings of the Rule of Law in reference to the particular legal and constitutional discourse of each country. Presented side by side, the country reports shall allow for comparison and reveal similarities and dissimilarities. The reports will be complemented by comparative analyses on the Rule of Law within different (legal-) cultural contexts. The country reports as well as the comparative texts will be published online on the internet in a wiki-style format, thus offering the possibility for interested readers to discuss the texts and to participate in their further development. All the texts will be in English.

...

I. Country Reports

The country reports are the core element of the project. They will be provided by various authors with a distinct insight into the specific legal system. The reports shall be brief and informative (round about 10-15.000 characters, three pages). In order to manage the inconsistency of the relevant literature and to achieve comparability, it seems reasonable to ensure the structural consistency of the country reports by using the following template:

Rule of Law-Template

Ø      The report starts off with a brief drafting of the*"{}sound"{*}that characterizes the specific discourse and relevant material. In the case ofBrazil, this could be the observation that authors generally agree that the Brazilian legal system provides for an exemplary conception of the Rule of Law, but only "in theory", as large parts of the country - the Amazonas region as well as the major cities - are not within the reach of the statutory jurisdiction.

...

Ø      Short list of further reading.

The following legal systems will be included in the examination so far:

Legal Cultural Area

Country

Author

Continental Europe

Germany

Matthias Koetter

 

France

Matthias Koetter

 

Italy

N. N.

Common Law

United Kingdom

Matthias Koetter

 

United States

N. N.

Eastern Europe

Russia

Ilja Skrylnikow

 

Hungary

Petra Bard

 

Poland, Ukraine

N. N.

 

Bosnia-Herzegovina

Ellen Fischer

 

Turkey

N. N.

Islamic context

Pakistan

Athar Minallah

 

Afghanistan

Hatem Elliesie

 

Egypt

Hatem Elliesie

 

Lebanon

N. N.

 

Iran

Ramin Moschtaghi

Africa / Post-Colonies

Ethiopia

Judit Y. Mengesha, Hatem Elliesie

 

Nigeria

Judit Y. Mengesha, N. N.

 

Sudan

Hatem Elliesie

Latin America

Argentina

Pablo Riberi

 

Chile

Rodrigo Correa Gonzalez

 

Brazil

via Leonardo Martins

 

Bolivia

via Aline Hirseland

Asia

China

Robert Heuser

 

Japan

Akiko Ejima

 

Hong Kong

Benny Tai (tbc)

 

India

Surya Deva

...

II. Additional Texts

The country reports will be complemented by comparative analyses that shall develop further materials from political and cultural sciences (also written in English, round about 30.000 to 40.000 characters or 10-12 pages). The texts may either be cross-country comparisons of legal systems and reports on cultural areas, e.g. "The Rule of Law in Constitutions of Countries with an Islamic cultural background" or "The European Understanding of the Rule of Law". The texts may also compare the development of the idea of Rule of Law form a cultural or philosophical historical perspective.

...

III. Presentation

Country reports and additional texts will be published online on a wiki-style webpage, which is provided by the Freie Universitaet Berlin (see http://www.cedis.fu-berlin.de/web20/wikis/index.html). Thus, the reports and texts will be easy to find and access, and the wiki format allows for cross-linking the contents and it enables readers to discuss and join in expanding the information, to modify the pages or add completely new ones. At least at the beginning, changes and additions carried out by the readers will be subject to the approval by the administrators of the online-project. At the best, the project will evolve into an expanding forum with content contributed not only by its initiators but by a broader reader/writer community.

...