Versionen im Vergleich

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.

...

The debate of rule of law concept(s) cannot be concerned with only the views put forward by the maîtres à penser of “Western” countries – at least for those rejecting a parochial “Eurocentric” bias. It is obvious that the attitude of “Western” intellectuals towards the “rule of law” is different from the attitude raised by “non-Western” (trained) partners, such as those who belong to the “Islamic World”. While “Westerners” belong to a historically unified tradition – even while it is open to different interpretations and outcomes --, “non-Westerners” look at the tradition “from outside” and compare it to their own (legal-) cultural forms (Costa / Zolo 2007: ix-xiii). Due to fact the term’s origin is “Western”, it requires a clarification as to the context in Islamic modeled states. That said, this article attempts to give an insight into the discourse of the rule of law in Islamic modeled states in general. The evolution of legal theory within current Muslim context cannot easily be equated with the general “Western” understanding of ‘rule of law’ due to inherently different historical and traditional Islamic influences, which is therefore why I use the term “Islamic modeled”. On the basis of the wide and especially complex field, it is, accordingly, neither possible to discuss all notions nor the entire spectrum of national views in the “Islamic World” (see the country reports on Afghanistan (Elliesie 2010b), Egypt (Elliesie 2010c), Sudan (Elliesie 2010d), Iran (Moschtaghi 2010)).

...

In conclusion, the precise content of the normative system of sharī‘a has been, and will continue to be, the product of human understanding (At-Tabarī 1971: 48 et seqq., 66) in its specific historical context (An-Na’im 2010: 44). Although sharī‘a laws are of divine provenance, the actual construction of the law is human activity, and its results represent the law of God as humanly understood. The ratio legis (hikma tashrī‘iyya) of a norm and its logical conclusion is a subjective understanding. Hence, at the time when one argues that norms in Qur’ān and Sunna are the understanding of justice at the time of the norm’s origin, then, one is able to exchange the perception of justice in the modern sense. One has to consider that law in the Islamic context does not descend from heaven ready-made, it is the human understanding of the law – the human fiqh- that must be normative for society (Weiss 1998: 116; An-Na’im 2010: 45). According to Assem Hefny and Mashood Baderin, Islamic set regulations and provisions pertaining to mundane matters are, in time and place, alterable. Attention should be paid to the doctrine of al‘illa -'illa wa-l-ma‘lūl ma'lūl whereby causes differ in time and place for which reason outcomes vary as well (Hefny 2010: 81 et seq.; Baderin 2010: 141). Hence, a generalization of the rule of law concept in respective countries should be avoided. Rather, one has to see it from a different angle; namely, that of the specific national legal understanding against the background of the dichotomy between its particular traditional influence of (Islamic) legal theory and contemporary law in action, i.e. legal reality.

Panel
VI.
Bibliography

Wiki-Markup
T. Al-Bishrī (1996), al-Wad‘ al-qānūnī bayna ash-sharī‘a al-islāmiyya wa-l-qānūn al-wad‘ī \[The legal Situation with regard to Islamic Shari‘a and Positive Law\], Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq.
Wiki-Markup

Rāshid Al-Ghannūshī (1999), _Muqārabāt fī al-‘ilmāniyya wa-l-mujtama‘ al-madanī_ \[Conceptions of Secularity and Civil Society\], London: al-Markaz al-Maghāribī li-l-buhūth wa-t-tarjama.
Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im (2010), Islam and Human Rights: Introductory Remarks and Reflections, in: Hatem Elliesie (ed.), _Islam und Menschenrechte / Islam and Human Rights / al-Islām wa-Huqūq al-Insān_, Peter Lang Publishing Group: Frankfurt a.M. / Berlin / New York / Oxford et al., pp. 41 et seqq.

Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im (2009), Shari’a and the Secular State in the Middle East and Europe, Carl Heinrich Becker Lecture der Fritz Thyssen Stiftung 2009, Berlin, pp. 105 et seqq.

Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im (2008), Shari’a in the Secular State: A Paradox of Seperation and Conflation; in: Peri Bearman / Wolfhart Heinrichs / Bernard G. Weiss (eds.), _The Law Applied: Contextualizing the Islamic Shari’a_, I.B. Tauris: London / New York.

Muhammad b. Jarīr At-Tabarī (1971), _Jāmi‘ al-bayān ‘an ta’wīl āyi al-Qur’ān_ (penned by Mahmūd Muhammad Shākir), vol. 6, Dār al-Ma‘ārif: Cairo.

Mashood Baderin (2010), Islam and Human Rights in the Constitutions of African States: Agenda for Good Governance, in: Hatem Elliesie (ed.), _Islam und Menschenrechte / Islam and Human Rights / al-Islām wa-Huqūq al-Insān_, Peter Lang Publishing Group: Frankfurt a.M. / Berlin / New York / Oxford et al., pp. 123 et seqq.

Raja Bahlul (2007), Is Constitutionalism Comparative with Islam?, in: Pietro Costa / Danilo Zolo (eds.), _The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism_, Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 515 et seqq.
Wiki-Markup

Azmī Bishāra (1993), Madkhal li-mu‘ālajāt ad-dīmuqrātiyya wa-‘ānmāt at-tadayyun \[Democracy and Religious Forms\], in: B. Ghalyūn / et al. (eds.), Hawla al-khiyār ad-dīmuqrātī \[The Democratic Alternative\], Ramallah: Muwātin.
Nathan J. Brown (1999), Islamic Constitutionalism in Theory and Practice, in: Eugene Cotran / Adel Omar Sherif (eds.), _Democracy, the Rule of Law and Islam_, Kluwer Law International: The Hague, pp. 491 et seqq.

Nathan J. Brown (1997), _The Rule of Law in the Arab World: Courts in Egypt and the Gulf_, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge / New York / Melbourne.

Cf. Pietro Costa / Danilo Zolo (2007), Preface; in: Pietro Costa / Danilo Zolo (eds.), _The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism,_ Springer: Dordrecht.

Baudouin Dupret (2007), The Rule of Morality Constrained Law: The Case of contemporary Egypt, in: Pietro Costa / Danilo Zolo (eds.), _The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism_, Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 543 et seqq. Cf.

Hatem Elliesie (2009a), Review Article re Holger Scheel (2007): Religionsfreiheit im Blickwinkel des Völkerrechts, des islamischen und ägyptischen Rechts, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, in: Recht in Africa (Law in Africa
 -- Droit en Afrique, volume 12, issue 1, Cologne, pp. 149 et seqq.

Hatem Elliesie (2009b), Rule of Law in Afghanistan, in Matthias Koetter / Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Understandings of the Rule of Law in various Legal Orders of the World, ([http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/download/attachments/23430100/ Elliesie+Afghanistan.pdf
).Hatem Elliesie
|http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/download/attachments/23430100/%20Elliesie+Afghanistan.pdf]).
Hatem Elliesie (2009c), Rule of Law in Egypt, in Matthias Koetter / Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Understandings of the Rule of Law in various Legal Orders of the World ([http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/download/attachments/23430389/Elliesie+Egypt.pdf|http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/download/attachments/23430389/Elliesie+Egypt.pdf]).

Hatem Elliesie (2009d), Rule of Law in the Sudan, in Matthias Koetter / Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Understandings of the Rule of Law in various Legal Orders of the World ([http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/download/attachments/24511234/Elliesie+Sudan.pdf|http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/download/attachments/24511234/Elliesie+Sudan.pdf]).

Josef Hans (1960), Dynamik und Dogma im Islam: Zeitgemäße Randglossen zur Rechts-, Staats\- und Sozialordnung, 2nd edition, Brill: Leiden.

Assem Hefny (2010), Hermeneutik, Koraninterpretation und Menschenrechte, in: Hatem Elliesie (ed.), _Islam und Menschenrechte / Islam and Human Rights / al-Islām wa-Huqūq al-Insān_, Peter Lang Publishing Group: Frankfurt a.M. / Berlin / New York / Oxford et al., pp. 73 et seqq.

Ahmad Hiba (1992), Ta‘līq ‘ala ijtihād hawla wilāyat al-mahkama ad-dustūriyya al-‘ulyā_,\_ _MAFQ_, Vol. 12, pp. 239 et seqq.

Nïmrod Hurvitz (2008), Law and Historiopgraphy: Legal Typology of Lands and the Arab Conquests, in: Peri Bearman / Wolfhart Heinrichs / Bernard G. Weiss, _The Law Applied: Contextualizing the Islamic Shari’a_, I.B. Tauris: London / New York.

Baber Johansen (2004), The Relationship between the Constitution, the Sharî’a and the Fiqh: The Jurisprudence of Egypt’s Constitutional Court, _Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht_ 64, pp. 881 et seqq.

Birgit Krawietz (2002), _Hierachie der Rechtsquellen im tradierten sunnitischen Islam_, Duncker & Humblot: Berlin.

Bernard Lewis (1993), Islam and Liberal Democracy, in: _Atlantic Monthly_, 27, pp. 89-98.

S.M. Lipset (1994), The social Requisites of Democracy revisited, in: American Sociological Review, 59.

Clark B. Lombardi (2008), Egypt’s Supreme Constitutional Court Managing Constitutional Conflict in an authoritarian, aspiratinonally ‘Islamic’ State in: _Journal of Comparative Law_, volume 3, issue 2, pp. 234 et seqq.

Harald Löschner (1971), _Die dogmatischen Grundlagen des šī‘itischen Rechts: Eine Untersuchung zur moderneren imāmitischen Rechtsquellenlehre_, Heymann: Köln.

Chibli Mallat (1997), A Comparative Note on the Judicial Protection of Basic Rights: Some Theoretical and Practical Issues, in: Eugene Cotran and Adel Omar Sharif (eds.), _The_ _Role of the Judiciary in the Protection of Human Rights_, Kluwer: London et al., pp. 393 et seqq.

Abū l-A‘lā Mawdūdī (1970), al-Qānūn al-islāmī wa-turuq tanfīdhihi, Dār al-Fikr: Beirut.

Hāshemi Mohammad (2002), _Hoquq-e asāsi-ye Jomhūri-ye Eslami-ye_ _Irān,_ volume I, Mizan: Teheran 1382.

Moojan Momen (1985), An Introduction to Shi‘i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi‘ism, Yale University Press: New Haven / London.

Ramin Moschtaghi (2010), Rule of Law in Iran, in Matthias Koetter / Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Understandings of the Rule of Law in various Legal Orders of the
World (
 World ([http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/ download/attachments/22347860/Moschtaghi+Iran.pdf|http://wikis.fu-berlin.de/
download
%20download/attachments/22347860/Moschtaghi+Iran.pdf]).

Naseef Naeem (2008), Einflüsse der Religionsklausel auf die Verfassungsgebung in islamisch geprägten Ländern, in: Birgit Krawietz / Helmut Reifeld (eds.), Islam und Rechtsstaat zwischen Scharia und Säkularisierung, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung: Sankt Augustin / Bonn, pp. 77 et seqq.

Mathias Rohe (2009), _Das islamische Recht: Geschichte und Gegenwart_, C. H. Beck: München.

Joseph Schacht (1982), _An Introduction to Islamic Law_, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Irene Schneider (2008), Islamisches Recht zwischen göttlicher Satzung und temporaler Ordnung? Überlegungen zum Grenzbereich zwischen Recht und Religion, in: Christine Langenfeld / Irene Schneider (eds.), _Recht und Religion in Europa: Zeitgenössische Konflikte und historische Perspektiven,_ Universitätsverlag Göttingen: Göttingen, p. 138 et seqq.

Hootan Shambayati (2008), Courts in Semi-Democratic/Authoritarian Regimes: The Judicialization of Turkish (and Iranian) Politics, in: Tom Ginsburg / Tamir Moustafa (eds.), _Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes,_ Cambridge University Press: Cambridge et al, pp. 283 et seqq.

Adel Omar Sherif (2005), Constitutions of Arab Countries and the Position of the Sharī‘a, in: Nadjma Yassari (ed.), The Sharī‘a in the Constitutions of Afghanistan, Iran and Egypt
 -- Implications for Private Law, Moor Siebeck: Tübingen, p. 155 et seqq.

Silvia Tellenbach (1985), _Untersuchungen zur Verfassung der islamischen Republik Iran vom 15. November 1979,_ Schwarz: Berlin.

Bernard Weiss (1998), _The Spirit of Islamic Law_, University of Georgia Press: Athens.