Upcoming Meeting: May 25th, 2022 at 11 am
Link to the meeting: https://fu-berlin.webex.com/fu-berlin/j.php?MTID=m16b66ed9079f2c668d1f9ce3df7a649b
Suggested Topics
- Recommendations for a joint initiative on Open Research Berlin (Maike Neufend, OABB)
- discussion about the study onMerrit - a study conducted 2020-2022 with Horizon 2020 funding to explore how OS might reproduce unequalities or even create new
- Did you ever use electronic lab notebooks and what are your experiences? Did someone use https://www.labarchives.com/ before?
- ...
- feel free to add your topics
Meeting May 25th, 2022
Attendees
- Franziska Harnisch (FU University Library, Open Science Community Building)
- Maatje Sophia Duine (Berlin Open Access Bureau, BUA Open Science dashboard project)
- Armin Glatzmeier (UB, wissenschaftliche Integrität)
- Néhémie Strupler (FU Berlin)
- Christina Riesenweber
- Maaike Duine,
- Maike Neufend
- Sascha Eckhold
- Stefan Skupien
Topics
Whats up?
Recommendations for a joint initiative on Open Research Berlin (Maike Neufend, OABB)
Empfehlung
-zentrale Beratungsstellen zu Rechtsfragen und Ethikfragen
Ziel
-OA Büro zu OS Büro ausbauen
Aktueller Stand
-neues Personal und Änderung der politischen Ausrichtung politischer Akteur*innen
Diskussion
-BUA plant OA/OS-Strategie
-welche Wirkung hätte OS-Strategie => für die Forschung nicht direkt relevant
=> Mittelvergabe direkter für Forschende
-Was kann eine zentrale Anlaufstelle für rechtliche und ethische Frage leisten?
-Kräfte bündeln, mit Spezialisierungen => rechtliche Clearingstelle wäre ein Teilbereich
Überlegung von vor 2 Jahren in der OSWG
-wenn das Thema politisch relevant wird, wollen wir Praxiscommunity aktiviert haben (praktisches Machen als Zusatz zu strategischer Planung) => Praktiker*innen zusammenführen
-keine solche Gruppe Berlinweit
-Gruppe zu konkreten OS-Praktiken
-Personen in Gremien
-BBAW mit Leitbild OS: https://www.bbaw.de/bbaw-digital/open-science
- the project: https://on-merrit.eu/
- EU-financed project to critically examine the perpetuation of disadvantages/formation of new inequalities through Open Science
- answer: yes
- different. Stakeholder with different goals how to implement OS/ pictures of OS
- science itself remains unequal, established mechanisms remain active => cumulative advantage
- OA
Simply publishing research as an open access publication does not automatically mean that the published information is available to all in the sense of being understandable.
- hierachy between different OA journals
OS practices for researchers: sometimes high discrepancy between personal values and those of the institutions
- answer: yes
- EU-financed project to critically examine the perpetuation of disadvantages/formation of new inequalities through Open Science
Proposals for action in the 4 main fields (https://zenodo.org/record/6276753#.Yo3st99CTb0)
- Resource-intensity of Open Research: Putting open and responsible research into practice requires considerable resources (including infrastructures, services, and training). The structural inequalities that exist within institutions, regions and nations, and on a global scale, create structural advantages for well-resourced actors and structural disadvantages for less-resourced actors, in terms of capacity and ability to engage in these practices.
- Article-processing charges and the stratification of Open Access publishing: The article processing charge (APC) model within Open Access publishing seems to discriminate against those with limited resources (especially those from less-resourced regions and institutions). These facts seem to be having effects of stratification in terms of who publishes where.
- Societal inclusion in research and policy-making: Open and responsible research processes take place within broader social systems where inequalities continue to structure access and privilege certain actors while others are disadvantaged. Despite laudable aims of equity, inclusion and diversity in open and responsible research, the most marginalised, vulnerable, and poor remain mostly excluded.
- Reform of reward and recognition: Institutional processes for reward and recognition not only do not sufficiently support the uptake of open and responsible research, but often get in the way of them. This disadvantages those who wish to take up these practices (putting early-career researchers especially at risk).
Meeting April 27th, 2022
Attendees
- Franziska Harnisch (FU University Library, Open Science Community Building)
- Maatje Sophia Duine (Berlin Open Access Bureau, BUA Open Science dashboard project)
- Néhémie Strupler
- Andreas Hübner (Geowissenschaften, UB FDM Liaison Librarian, NFDI4Earth)
- Kristina Eichel
Topics
Whats up?
- Invitation to public opening event of the project "Critical Library Perspectives" with a keynote 'Politics of the Library', more details here
- First Open Science Lunch May 12th, 12:30pm, details
Discussion of Berliner Appell
Questions
-What can we do to make the appeal work? Who to connect with, who to approach at the university level?
collection of initiatives on different structural/ organizational levels:
Berlin
https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Fellow-Programm_Freies_Wissen/Berliner_Appell
Germany
https://reproducibilitynetwork.de
- formulation of requests on how grass-root could be supported by top-down actions
- Kristina is involved with her project
Conclusion
-different networks/ initiatives work on this topic
further action
Maaike invites Maxi and Maike to talk about the initiative on the Berlin-level (https://blogs.fu-berlin.de/open-access-berlin/2022/03/15/empfehlung-fuer-eine-landesinitiative-open-research-berlin/)
What you do, when you hit a paywall?
informal talk about it
-publications about the Ithaka study "Chancelling the Big Deal"
- report by Ithaka S+R about the study:Cooper, Danielle, and Oya Y. Rieger. "What’s the Big Deal?: How Researchers Are Navigating Changes to Journal Access ." Ithaka S+R. Ithaka S+R. 22 June 2021. Web. 28 April 2022. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.315570
- Interview of the university library's team with Ithaka: https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/cancelling-the-big-deal-project-spotlight/
- article of the university library's team about the study and first results: Hagel, Michael Dominik, Harnisch, Franziska, Kowalak, Mario and Wagner, Cosima. "Projekt Benutzungsforschung International: Beteiligung der Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin am Projekt „Cancelling the Big Deal“ (Ithaka S+R 2021)" ABI Technik, vol. 41, no. 4, 2021, pp. 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2021-0043
Concept for OER Community Learning Events
-three parts/ steps (action to discussion)
1. Workshop with teaching staff to create own OER materials
target group: teaching staff, who would like to do it, but did not yer
aim: create own OER materials fast
2. Presentation of recent study "Reflecting Open Practices on Digital Infrastructures" (see poster)
presentation of results regarding OER
discussion about finding/ thesis: would semester plans for basic methodical seminars be useful as OER?
3. Input and discussion about openness in the context of the university focussing on OER
Is the aim to produce high quality teaching materials right aim or does it hinder OER?
Why should I produce OER?
questions for OSWG attendees
Which aspects are most interesting for you?
Would you attend the three events?
- Why?
- What would make you attend?
feedback
-practical question to be answered in workshop: where to best put one's OERs?
-interesting question would be, what to do with student's feedback on OER materials
-semester plans as OER would be interesting for teaching staff to have kind of tool box for the areas (topic, method, material)
-there is a collection of for geosciences
https://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/digitale-lehre/ressourcen/geo/index.html
=> What should be done with them regarding further use, long term archiving?
=> Are these materials OER?
admin
Who would like to be added to the homepage or wiki of the OSWG?
result
all of today's attendees want to be added and get writing access to the wiki
All others are welcome as well! If you are interested, get in touch with Franziska
Meeting February 23rd, 2022
Attendees
- Franziska Harnisch (FU University Library, Open Science Community Building)
- Moritz Maxeiner (FU Information Science, Dahlem Research Center for Machine Learning, Open.Make, Open Hardware)
- Sascha Eckhold (FU UL/CeDiS, Services for Teaching & Learning, Trainings, OER)
- Cosima Wagner (FU UL, Research Librarian for Digital Humanities, RDM, Area Studies & East Asian Studies, Japanese Studies)
- Malte Henningsen (PostDoc PhilGeist Linguistics, Neuroscience of language, neuronal networks, interactive data visualisation, "cross disciplinary" data literacy education)
- Maatje Sophia Duine (Berlin Open Access Bureau, BUA Open Science dashboard project)
- Dennis Mischke (Ada Lovelace DH Center, FU)
- Julien Colomb (Research Data Manager, Open Hardware, OpenMake-Project, HU)
- Esther Asef (University Library, Research Data Management Officer, FU)
- Alex Fütterer (University Library, Research Data Management Officer, FU)
- Néhémie Strupler
Suggested topics
Action
Let's plan a community learning event for April or May!
Aim:
- get our name out, tie in to our program (i.e. OER),
- focus on facilitation of cultural change what "open science" means, OA and OS (difference?),
- OER is a very good example / use case for that!
- cross-disciplinary data literacy and OER?
- challenge to connect OER and OS?!
- → combine OS, cultural change and OER!
- "Hacky Hour"/ Open Meeting on examples for students: visualization and OS, low level event
- Short intro / pitfalls of doing OER, first steps for people
- Teaching, using resources which are open, how do you know that they are really open? → there are regular workshops from FU UL/CedIS already
- collaborate with OER "practitioners" from the university community in the workshop
- Next step: conceptualization of OER workshop → please contact Franziska & Sascha
Suggestions for topics
- Open Hardware
- Visualisation
- OER
Methods
- short workshop?
- hacky hour?
For whom? taget group?
Public: within the university? general public?
- general public: "Lange Nacht der Wissenschaft" - do we want to educate the general public with an event on OS?
- maybe concentrate first on the university
Exchange
- Report from the Una Europa OER Staff Week (Sascha):
- 1Europe: create one virtual joint campus for 9 Una Europa universities
- Focus of the staff week: create an OER mission statement for Una Europa; not a policy but a starting point for creating a policy; advance collaboration with regard to OER within Una Europa.
- Establish OER at FU
- Establish OER within Una Europa
- Definition: OER = learning, teaching AND research (based on UNESCO definition), but aiming at "receiving a copy" not just "access" to a resources
Admin
- Future of the mailing list - info channel for everyone vs. organisation channel for our community
- keep it as it is...
- How to agree on dates for the meetings (via poll, fixed day each month...)
- foodle/dudle is ok
- monthly meetings
- mornings/afternoons
Suggested Schedule
Short Introduction of each other | |
Agreeing on agenda for the meeting | |
Discussion of topics |
Meeting January 27th, 2022
Schedule
time | topic |
---|---|
4pm | Welcome, Short intro to OSWG |
4:05 | Getting to know each other |
4:15 | collecting topics |
4:45 | What's next @ OSWG? |
Aim of the meeting
The main aim of this meeting is getting to know each other respectively getting in touch again.
Furthermore, it would be exciting to learn which topics everyone is currently dealing with and which developments in the field of OS you are particularly interested in.
How shall we proceed with the OSWG in terms of regular meetings, topics to be covered.
Notes
Attendees
- Franziska Harnisch (UB, Open Science Community Building)
- Moritz Maxeiner (Informatik, Open.Make, Open Hardware)
- Sascha Eckhold (UB/CeDiS, Dienste für Lehre und Studium, Fortbildung, OER)
- Daniel Mietchen (Biophysik, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9488-1870, https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.68.66685, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002027, Wikipedia, Wikidata)
- Esther Asef (UB, Forschungdsdatenmanagement)
- Andreas Hübner (Geowissenschaften, UB FDM Liaison Librarian, NFDI4Earth)
- Cosima Wagner (UB, Forschungsbibliothekarin Digital Humanities FDM Area Studies & Ostasienwissenschaften, Japanologie)
- Malte Henningsen (PostDoc PhilGeist Linguistik, Neuronale Netze)
- Sibylle Söring (UB, Leitung Team FDM; Digital Humanities)
- Alex Fütterer (Team FDM)
- Christina Riesenweber (UB, Team Open Access und wissenschaftliches Publizieren)
Topics
- establishing and implementing Open Science beacon projects @FU
- going through Openness from A-Z
- people can watch, participate or copy
- model: Fellow Programm Freies Wissen, Wikimedia
- creating a collection of Use Cases und Best Practices to have a place where to refer to and look up practical hints
- taking part in shaping the Open Science Policy of FU
- organize events to collaboratively learn about a certain topic (inviting experts as well as sharing knowledge we already have in our circle) - possibly events for a more general public
- visualization tools
- data analysis and data exploration
- will also be priority of new DH-Center (Ada Lovelace Center for Digital Humanities, AP Dennis Mischke https://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/ub/ueber-uns/team/mischke/index.html)
- interim publications and interim releases with value for teaching
- Software and Hardware are interim products, their creation should also be credited/ rewarded
What's next for OSWG
- Include "Open Scholarship" and "Open Research" to better address humanities
- involve students/ representatives of the student body
- involve people, who deal with teaching in higher education
- We go on collecting and sharing ideas here in the wiki (Contact Franziska to get writing permission or send your remarks directly to Franziska)
- We try to attract more interested people
- We will meet monthly
- next meeting is sheduled for 23.02.2022- 11am
- suggested topics can be added in the wiki in the section "suggested topics" of each meeting